>Ultimate Reality in that way can be properly considered to be “formless” but not in the sense that its identity is an ambiguous presence, but that phenomenologically we can’t consider the Absolute to be conditioned by phenomena. In true reality, the unconditioned goes beyond formlessness as well.
>Form and formlessness, each of these are on condition of another, they dependently arise together.
Yes, I think the correct term for this would be "supra-essential" or "pre-essential". To consider the ultimate reality "formal" or "formless" would be like trying to order a set of only 1. It only has one order and it is 1, which is both the most ordered it could possibly be and the most disordered it could possibly be.
>Ultimate Reality in that way can be properly considered to be “formless” but not in the sense that its identity is an ambiguous presence, but that phenomenologically we can’t consider the Absolute to be conditioned by phenomena. In true reality, the unconditioned goes beyond formlessness as well.
>Form and formlessness, each of these are on condition of another, they dependently arise together.
Yes, I think the correct term for this would be "supra-essential" or "pre-essential". To consider the ultimate reality "formal" or "formless" would be like trying to order a set of only 1. It only has one order and it is 1, which is both the most ordered it could possibly be and the most disordered it could possibly be.
https://hellenicfaith.wordpress.com/aion/